![]() I am still a little curious if anyone can ever see you, and if so would you be considered complicit in a crime? because that would be quite the deal breaker. going to post regardless to help with anyone else with the same question. I am a little tired right now, so that can happen. 1 day ago &0183 &32 All surveys were anonymous and companies paid no fees to participate. assuming that what I am asking is a valid issue.Īnd I am sorry if this makes no sense. In fact, I would argue that this would make the service more dangerous than vanilla bittorrent, as you could theoretically get in trouble for distributing anything just by being a part of the system. ![]() Please see here for more about encryption and anonymity. is this actually an issue? or does tribler do something that prevents this from happening? Please note that, although other clients support encryption, that does not make them more anonymous. The owner would then be able to look at everyone that they are sending information to, and know that those individuals are redistributing copyrighted material. Tribler, created by Delft University of Technology researchers about a decade ago, is now conducting a public test of its BitTorrent client aimed at providing anonymity. I could easily see content owners looking to take down the service by downloading whatever work that they want to protect, and then continuing to seed that media. My understanding is that when you seed a torrent, you encrypt that data, send it to a handful of other users, and they send it to others along the chain leading to the eventual user. My understanding of tribler is that it functions in a similar way to tor, except that it has no designated entry or exit nodes. One big concern that I have about using tribler is that I am worried about getting in trouble for essentially seeding a torrent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |